In which Jony Jaa discovers his feminine side.
There really is a real plot to Ong Bak 2. It matters. It makes sense. No matter what you read on that silly old IMDb there is a bucketload of action and the last 20 minutes make total narrative sense.
Ong Bak 2 is a stupidly beautiful film, but not for reasons of production value, high budget, camera work or even those stunningly lush locations.
No. Ong Bak 2 is a celebration of the beauty of the human form. It gorges itself on the possibilities inherent in the body, the visceral action-reaction of violent physics in physical violence, the pure poetry of motion, the lyricism of grunt and roar as body crunches into body, the glint of muted sun on bronzed flesh, the art of blood on dirt, the glory of broken bone and the slow, inevitable sink into lifelessness when man after man drops to his doom.
We know Tony Jaa does Muay Thai. We know how fast and brutal that is. Tony knows we’ve seen that and expect more of the same: he brought us that thrilling experience, and again. Now Tony wants you to understand other physical poetry. other forms of beautiful, violent expression. Here he branches sublimely into a gentle dashing of Samurai and a brain-blowing exhibition of Kung Fu. There is no chatter here, no mundane threat, no posing, no floppy silken attire, no class vs class, no fooling around. This is stunning portrayal after portrayal of the purpose of the Tiger, of the Snake, of the Crane, of sake. Here we have the raw power of the beasts as the old Boxer Masters would have it, where claws dig and rake, where fingertip gouges, where elbow and knee claim blood and bone in equal excess. The Tiger is shown at its peak here, taking the centre of the stage and the bulk of the victims: and rightly so, for the Tiger is the greatest mix of strength and speed – the closest spiritually to the power of Jaa’s native Muay Thai. The Tiger chambers, pounces at the exact moment and flips and roars and does not stop until its prey is dead. It is speed, it is power, it is grace.
And grace is here in abundance. Do not expect for an instant that any opportunity to show the glory of the physical is lost. We even have a few brief interjections of music and dance, exquisitely performed by a glowing innocent, coda to yet more explosive performance. The only thing missing is full nudity and sex, neither of which would have been remotely welcome.
Did I mention the weapons? No, fool that I am. There are many. Here we have the dance of the blade handled expert by the many, from dagger to curved sword to broadsword, Turkish dagger and steel claw, each against the other and frequently against Jaa’s bare hands. He glides around and between, through and around, turning back over himself and his opponents to find a way to flow the blood, time after time.
But my own treasure in this film, similarly to Jet Li’s immortal “Fist of Legend” is the awesome power of the flight of hand. Oh so many scenes in lesser films rely on great, swooping kicks, high flying and swinging and good-looking in slo-mo and totally absurd to even try to use in an actual fight. No. We have, here, object lessons in how a few insanely fast and thoroughly plausible applications of hand and fist and forearm and elbow can send someone flying breathless and with no idea what happened. In those few masterly motions we have the true power of well-learned Martial Arts, the glory of Kung Fu, the grace of Muay Thai – that, simply, when practised properly not only should an action be fast and effective, the poor bastard lying on the floor should have absolutely no clue what just hit him.
Roll on Ong Bak 3
Dear Mr Tarantino.
Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009wtf?
No really, What The Fuck has happened to your delightful, complex timeshifting integrated timelines, your unflinching brutality, your sparkling dialogue? What The Fuck has happened to interesting characters, plots that fly around and intrigue, those amazing ‘Holy Shit’ moments when something fucking STUNNING happens on screen that no other director would even think of, let alone try?
I went to see Inglourious Basterds last night. Based on the trailers and reviews I skimmed over, I was in for two-and-a-half hours of Hot Nazi Death dealt at the hands of 8 [count 'em] seriously pissed Jewish American soldiers. Well, except that the Guardian review described your latest flick as a transcendent disappointment. A collossal windbag of a film.
Well fuck me if the Guard wasn’t right.
You’d think, of all the events in history that could possibly be abused, the Nazi occupation of France would provide 24 hours of non-stop skull crushing entertainment. There’s a FUCKING LOT of revenge to be gotten right there. Plotting that would make your nipples bleed in sheer ecstasy. Action to make the entire Eastern film industry quit overnight. Apparently not. Iglourious Basterds is, instead, a film about 8 [count 'em] Jewish Americans mostly getting their arses handed to them while a few particularly cunning Germans fuck them righteously. Along with the rest of France, of course. Not that you’d know.
Even the usually highly watchable Brad Pitt [yes, I like Brad Pitt. Sod off] seems to be filling in for someone who caught a harsh cold at the last minute. That’s in the same manner as Uma Thurman reading an autocue – badly – for the entirety of Kill Bill.
Still, at least the strangely Wizard Of Oz finale works out alright.
Kinda.
Posted in Comment, Movies, reviews | No Comments »